Books:
Visit the Whosoever Bookstore
Or search Amazon.com for books related to GLBT people and Christianity. GLBT
Christianity Book Search
If you live in Canada, follow
this link:
GLBT
Christianity Book Search -- Amazon.ca
If you live in the UK, follow
this link:
GLBT
Christianity Book Search -- Amazon.co.uk
Join the Whosoever Community:
Read More Whosoever:
Issue 54:
Gracious Christianity
Issue 55:
The Good Book
More issues ...
|
Schadenfreude
"Should
I feel bad that I feel good when bad things happen to other people?" That
is a paraphrase of friends' inquiries in recent weeks. "Other people" here
does not refer to just "any people." If it did, feeling thus would be a
big sin over which one should certainly feel bad. "Other people" here means
those with names like Abramoff, Bennett, Brown, DeLay, Frist, Lewis, Lott,
Rove, etc. Or "other people" refers to groups like "the people who gave
us the Iraq War" or "those who botched the response to disasters" or "those
who saw their economic programs set back." The list includes some presumably
innocent, some guilty, and some embarrassed folk, all less free now to be
as triumphalist as they had been.
This column is more about framing issues than about framing people,
so I now put on my "sighting" glasses and my "framing" mien. And with
them, I don my academic theologian's gown and my retired confessor's robe,
because we are talking about "sin." To the point: "SHAHD-n-froy-duh" is
"a malicious satisfaction in the misfortunes of others." The adjective
"malicious" forces us to call it "sin." Now we enter the sphere of confession.
Before going too far in that direction, it is important to give counsel.
Remember, friends, your satisfaction, even joy (freude), arrives during
your half of a long inning. They had satisfaction when names like Clinton
were in the embarrassing headlines. You interrupt: "But we reciprocated
at once with Schadenfreude in the moment when the main accusers of the
errant President were immediately exposed as first-class adulterers."
That moment lasted only a moment, and they soon won some elections and
trumped your Schadenfreude with theirs, in their long half of an inning.
And should you come back to power some day, they will be ready to play
the Schadenfreude card in spades.
Returning to theological and not prudential concerns: The sin that goes
with "malice" is "envy." Before long we will rack up Seven Deadly Sins
associated with your feeling momentarily good. So we can't get past the
reasoning of the Germans, who have a patent on the word in question: This
is some sort of sin of some sort of size. But to be the victim of Schadenfreude
expressions you have to a) have a near-monopoly on power and b) boast
and swagger and tromp on others while asserting it. Any ironist knows
that this is a set-up for a downfall.
I too often quote W. C. Fields, who said he'd spent years studying the
Bible, looking for a loophole. Theologically, I can't find a loophole
that says Schadenfreude isn't a sin. Relishing and expressing it, however,
does not hurt those against whom it is expressed; he or she or they brought
their misfortunes on themselves. So, aware that letting us -- I'm in this
company too! -- off lightly is what Bonhoeffer called "cheap grace," I'd
say that the sinners pay a price for their sin.
But admit it, enjoying Schadenfreude is so delicious, the impulse to
express it so irresistible, that for the moment one has to hope that God
is not looking, or is at least winking, knowing that guilty mortals will
find a way to endure. And those enjoying Schadenfreude now are waiting
for the time when they will once again be the victims of those who are
presently squirming in their own embarrassment.
Martin E. Marty's
biography, current projects, upcoming events, publications, and contact
information can be found at www.illuminos.com.
Sightings comes
from the Martin
Marty Center at the University of Chicago Divinity School.
Copyright © by the author
All Rights Reserved
Back to the Table of Contents
|