|
In the gospel of John there is a shift, as I see it, from how the word belief
is understood and used as compared with the synoptic gospels of Mark,
Matthew, and Luke.
These two contrasting uses of the word belief are:
1) Belief in or acceptance of the personhood of Jesus.
and...
2) Belief in or acceptance of the soundness of Jesus' positions.
In the former, belief in the person - who he is - is of concern. In the
latter, belief in the position - what he advocates - is of concern.
John uses the word "belief" about fifty times in his gospel. Six times as often
as Matthew and nearly twice as often as all the other evangelists combined.
Compare some verses that use the word belief in the synoptic gospels with
verses from John:
Emphasis is upon believing: the good news, my words, all that the prophets
have spoken. Examine the paradigm shift in use of the word belief when
reading verses on belief in John:
Notice how the shift is to personhood: believes in him, you may have life in
his name, to believe in the one, believing you may have life in his name.
Matthew of the synoptic gospels is an action man, a "deeds" man. Below is what
he thinks we should do in life and what he thinks will be the consequences of
our performance or nonperformance. Here Jesus is recorded as having said:
Note that Matthew's criterion of judgment is not confession of faith in
Christ. Nothing is said of grace or justification. What counts is whether one
has acted with loving care for needy people.
There are other evidences in Matthew which suggest that he believes in
salvation by works:
He does not have Jesus say that the reward will be in heaven, but these
subsequent verses suggest that that is what he had in mind:
Again Matthew is consistent when he writes what we have come to call the
great commission where instead of personhood he opts for action, for
performance, "...teaching them to obey..."
By the time the gospel of John was written, some ten years after the last
synoptic gospel, their may have been indeed a paradigm shift in the word
belief from the mere acceptance of the soundness of Jesus' positions to the
acceptance of his personhood; from more of a concern with what he advocated
to more of a concern with who this Jesus is.
Yet even in John's gospel: [14:23] "Jesus replied, 'If anyone loves me, he
will obey my teaching. My Father will love him, and we will come to him and
make our home with him." Surely all verses from John must be put in context
with this one. [Emphasis mine.]
Yes, in John we find: "[1:31] "But these are written that you may believe
that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have
life in his name."
But while John's gospel may have argued that belief in Jesus as God's son was
necessary it did not imply that it was sufficient for salvation. Jesus
himself gave the lie to that interpretation in Matthew's gospel where he
said: [7:21] "Not everyone who says to me, `Lord, Lord,' will enter the
kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of my Father who is in
heaven."
But what is this teaching that Jesus wants to obey? It is this one:
In Matthew's gospel [12:37-39] Jesus tell us: "Teacher, which is the greatest
commandment in the Law?" Jesus replied: "`Love the Lord your God with all
your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.' This is the first
and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: `Love your neighbor as
yourself.'"
He goes on to tell us in verse 40 that the achievement of this end was what
all the requirements of the law and all the endeavors of the prophets were
about: "All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments."
The gospel has very good news for those of us who are transgendered, gay, or
lesbian. There is no exclusion listed because of sexuality in Matthew's
passage stipulating Jesus' only mandate for salvation -- that passage in
Matthew in which Jesus very graphically insisted that his followers show
their love for God and neighbor by showing concern for the poor and needy.
In fact, Jesus never said anything negative about gay people. He did say that
the sin of Sodom was inhospitality.
It was Paul's conjectures in the New Testament that mention homosexuality.
Paul tossed out the idea that idolatry might be causative of homosexuality.
He also suggested that it was unnatural. We are indebted to Paul for having
told us why he thought homosexual conduct was undesirable.
Today, now that it has been politically correct to look, we find that
homosexuality is not uncommon in the animal kingdom. Few of today's
homosexual oriented Christians have anything to do with idolatry. If Paul had
the kind of knowledge we have today about what constitutes the natural or if
he had the experience of knowing life-long, loving, same-gendered couples
raising the cast off children of heterosexuals he might have been more
supportive of gay people.
Paul was well intentioned but he found it impossible to rise above his chauvinistic, homophobic culture when it came to gays and women.
So what does it mean to believe?
Belief in the synoptics meant trust - trust that Jesus was on the right track
-- an affirmation that the overall theme in scripture had been love of God
and love of man.
Belief in John's gospel emphasized an acceptance, an acknowledgment, that
Jesus, as son of God, had put his imprimatur on this affirmation.
|
Visit the Whosoever Bookstore Or search Amazon.com for books related to GLBT people and Christianity.
Websites:
Also In This Issue:
The Effects of Belief: Exile and Holiness
|